242 THE NATURE OF THE GODS.as easily discover what is true as I can overthrow what

is false. XXXIII. You have enumerated with so ready a memory, and so copiously, the opinions of philosophers, from Thales the Milesian, concerning the nature of the Gods, that I am surprised to see so much learning in a Roman. But do you think they were all madmen who thought that a Dei ty could by some possibility exist without hands and feet ? Does not even this consideration have weight with you when you consider what is the use and advantage of limbs in men, and lead you to admit that the Gods have no need of them ? What necessity can there be of feet, without walking; or of hands, if there is nothing to be grasped? The same may be asked of the other parts of the body, in which nothing is vain, nothing useless, nothing superflu ous ; therefore we may infer that no art can imitate the skill of nature. Shall the Deity, then, have a tongue, and not speak teeth, palate, and jaws, though he will have no use for them ? Shall the members which nature has given to the body for the sake of generation be useless to the Deity ? Nor would the internal parts be less superfluous than the external. What comeliness is there in the heart, the lungs, the liver, and the rest of them, abstracted from their use? I mention these because you place them in the Deity on account of the beauty of the human form. Depending on these dreams, not only Epicurus, Metro- dorus, and Hermachus declaimed against Pythagoras, Pla to, and Empedocles, but that little harlot Leontium pre sumed to write against Theophrastus : indeed, she had a neat Attic style; but yet, to think of her arguing against Theophrastus ! So much did the garden of Epicurus 1 abound with these liberties, and, indeed, you are always complaining against them. Zeno wrangled. Why need I mention Albutius? Nothing could be more elegant or humane than Pha3drus ; yet a sharp expression would dis gust the old man. Epicurus treated Aristotle with great contumely. He foully slandered Phsedo, the disciple of Socrates. He pelted Timocrates, the brother of his com panion Metrodorus, with whole volumes, because he disa greed with him in some trifling point of philosophy. He

1 Epicurus taught his disciples in a garden.