Page:De Vinne, Invention of Printing (1876).djvu/564

< Page:De Vinne, Invention of Printing (1876).djvu

This page needs to be proofread.

554

index.

⁠

⁠

Type-founding, as done by Franklin

Type-found„ by novices

Type-found„ early notices of

Type-making a secret art

61

Type-maki„ in China

Type-metal, ingredients of

Type-mould, the key to the invention

67

Type-mould, adjustable

Type-mould,„ made by goldsmiths

Type-mould,„ of early printers

Type-mould,„ of Garamond

Type-mould,„ of Gutenberg

Type-mould,„ of sand

Types of wood, Junius's description of

Types„ of woo„as made in Japan

53

Types of wood, experimental

Types„ of woo„ De la Borde's theory of

Types„ of woo„ limitations of

53

Types„ of woo„ Specklin's description of

Types„ as made by Conrad Winters

Types„ Chinese, early forms of

Types„ Chinese,„ modern orms of„

Types„ early, cast and not cut

Types„ early faces of

Types„ early speculations about

36

Types„ engraved, impracticable

Types„ Gothic, popularity of

Types„ how made

Types„ of Jenson

Types„ made by one method only

53

Types„ made in sand moulds

Types„ must be accurate

52

Types„ not made, with system

Types„ of brass, notices of

65

Types„ of glass

Types„ of Gutenberg

Types„ of lead, as made by Blades

Types„ of lead,„ as made by„ Coster

Types„ of porcelain

Types„ of Schœffer

Types„ quantity of usually cast

Types„ smallest sizes in 15th century

Types„ unknown printer

Types„ variations of form explained

Typography, advantages of

23, 26

Typography,„ cheapness of method

23

Typography,„ Chinese method of

Typography,„ claimants of invention

27

Typography,„ depends on other aids

47

Typography,„ erroneous ideas about

49

Typography,„ is a science

Typography,„ not fruit of engraving

Typography,„ period of its invention

27

Typography,„ why it was delayed

39

Typothetæ, arms of

⁠

Uneven spacing in early printing

University of Paris

Unknown printer of Netherlands

Unknown„ printer„ period of

Unknown printer, workmanship of

Utrecht, early printing of

Utrecht,„ Speculum traced to

⁠

Valdarfer Christopher

Van der Linde's Haarlem Legend

Van der„ Linde's„ exposure of fraud

Van Eyck Hubert

Veldener John

Vellum, how made

Vellum,„ early scarcity of

Vellum,„ not suitable for printing

Venice, early printing in

Venice,„ famous for printing

Venice,„ playing cards of

89

Venice,„ relations of with China

Venice,„ the school of typography

Verard of Paris

Vindiciæ Typographicæ

Vocabularium ex quo

Von Bischoviszheim, testimony of

Von Seckingen, testimony of

Von Zabern Barbel, testimony of

⁠

Weidenbach, printing at

William of Saliceto, Treatise of

Wimpheling, testimony of

Winaricky's book on Gutenberg

Wine-flagons of Coster

Witnesses on trial at Strasburg

Wittig Ivo, tablet of

Witty Speeches of Great Men

Wonders of Rome, the block-book

Wood-cuts, early, merit of

68

Wood-cut„ difficult to print with types

Wood-cut„ dissimilarities of

Wood-cut„ early, designed by artists

Wood-cut„ later, inferiority of

Wood-cut„ liability to warp

Wood-cut„ mutilations of

Wood-cut„ neglected by early printers

Wood-cut„ not printed with types

Wood types, impracticability of

Wood types„ Enschedé's remarks on

Wood types„ experiments with

Wood used by early engravers

⁠

Xylography, limitations of

Xylography,„ Chinese method of

Xylography,„ first method of

Xylography,„ not applicable to books

Xylography,„ not Gutenberg's art

Xylography,„ not practised at Haarlem

⁠

Zainer Gunther

Zappe Paul, the ambassador

Zarot Anthony

Zell Ulric, about the Donatus

Zell„ Ulric,„ as a printer

This article is issued from Wikisource. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.