Bismuth.—Bismuth is of special interest, as being the most

strongly diamagnetic substance known, the mean value of the best determinations of its susceptibility being about −14 × 10⁻⁶ (see G. Meslin, C. R., 1905, 140, 449). The magnetic properties of the metal at different temperatures and in fields up to 1350 units have been studied by P. Curie (loc. cit.), who found that its “specific susceptibility” (Κ) was independent of the strength of the field, but decreased with rise of temperature up to the melting-point, 273°C. His results appear to show the relation

Assuming the density of Bi to be 9.8, and neglecting corrections for heat dilatation, his value for the susceptibility at 20°C. is equivalent to κ = −13.23 × 10⁻⁶. As the temperature was raised up to 273°, κ gradually fell to −9.38 × 10⁻⁶, rising suddenly when fusion occurred to −0.37 × 10⁻⁶, at which value it remained constant when the fluid metal was further heated. Fleming and Dewar give for the susceptibility the values −13.7 × 10⁻⁶ at 15°C. and −15.9 × 10⁻⁶ at −182°, the latter being approximately equivalent to Κ × 10⁶ = −1.62. Putting t° = −182 in the equation given above for Curie’s results, we get Κ × 10⁶ = −1.66, a value sufficiently near that obtained by Fleming and Dewar to suggest the probability that the diamagnetic susceptibility varies inversely as the temperature between −182° and the melting-point.

Other Diamagnetics.—The following table gives Curie’s determinations (Journ. de Phys., 1895, 4, 204) of the specific susceptibility Κ of other diamagnetic substances at different temperatures. It should be noted that Κ = κ/density.

For all diamagnetic substances, except antimony and bismuth, the value of Κ was found to be independent of the temperature.

Paramagnetic Substances.—Experiments by J. S. Townsend (Phil. Trans., 1896, 187, 533) show that the susceptibility of solutions of salts of iron is independent of the magnetizing force, and depends only on the quantity of iron contained in unit volume of the liquid. If W is the weight of iron present per c.c. at about 10°C., then for ferric salts

and for ferrous salts

the quantity −0.77 arising from the diamagnetism of the water of solution. Annexed are values of 10⁶κ for the different salts examined, w being the weight of the salt per c.c. of the solution.

Susceptibility was found to diminish greatly with rise of temperature. According to G. Jäger and S. Meyer (Wien. Akad. Sitz., 1897, 106, II. a, p. 623, and 1898, 107, II. a, p. 5) the atomic susceptibilities k of the metals nickel, chromium, iron, cobalt and manganese in solutions of their salts are as follows:—

Fe(1) is iron contained in FeCl₂ and Fe(2) iron contained in Fe₂(NO₃)₆.

Curie has shown, for many paramagnetic bodies, that the specific susceptibility K is inversely proportional to the absolute temperature θ. Du Bois believes this to be an important general law, applicable to the case of every paramagnetic substance, and suggests that the product Kθ should be known as “Curie’s constant” for the substance.

Elementary Bodies and Atomic Susceptibility.—Among a large number of substances the susceptibilities of which have been determined by J. Koenigsberger (Wied. Ann., 1898, 66, 698) are the following elements:—

In a table accompanying Koenigsberger’s paper the elements are arranged upon the periodic system and the atomic susceptibility (product of specific susceptibility into atomic weight) is given for each. It appears that the elements at about the middle of each row are the most strongly paramagnetic; towards the ends of a row the susceptibility decreases, and ultimately becomes negative. Thus a relation between susceptibility and atomic weight is clearly indicated. Tables similarly arranged, but much more complete, have been published by S. Meyer (Wied. Ann., 1899, 68, 325 and 1899, 69, 236), whose researches have filled up many previously existing gaps. The values assigned to the atomic susceptibilities of most of the known elements are appended. According to the notation adopted by Meyer the atomic susceptibility k = κ × atomic-weight / (density × 1000).

Element	106k		Element	106k	Element	106k
Be	+0.72		Cu	−0.006	Cs	− 0.03*
B	+0.05		Zn	−0.010	Ba	− 0.02*
C	−0.05		Ga	−	La	+13.0
N	?		Ge	−	Ce	+34.0
O	+		As	?	Pr	+	${\displaystyle \scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\\\ \\\ \ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,}}$Strong
F	−0.01*		Se	−0.025	Nd	+
· · · · · · · · · ·			Br	−0.033	Sa	+
Na	−0.005*		· · · · · · · · · ·		Gd	+
Mg	+0.014		Rb	−0.02*	· · · · · · · · · ·
Al	+		Sr	−0.02*	Er	+41.8(?)
Si	+0.002		Y	+3.2(?)	· · · · · · · · · ·
P	−0.007		Zr	−0.014	Yb	+   (?)
S	−0.011		Nb	+0.49(?)	Ta	+ 1.02(?)
Cl	−0.02*		Mo	+0.024	W	+ 0.1
· · · · · · · · · ·			Ru	+	Os	+ 0.074
K	−0.001*		Rh	+	Ir	+
Ca	−0.003*		Pd	+0.55	Pt	+ 0.227
Sc	?		Ag	−0.016	Au	− 0.031
Ti	+0.09		Cd	−0.015	Hg	− 0.030
V	+0.17		In	+0.01*	Tl	− 0.93
Cr	+	${\displaystyle \scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\\\ \\\ \\\ \ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,}}$Strong	Sn	+0.004*	Pb	− 0.025
Mn	+		Sb	−0.069	Bi	− 0.023
Fe	+		Te	−0.039	· · · · · · · · · ·
Co	+		I	−0.040	Th	+16.0(?)
Ni	+		· · · · · · · · · ·		U	+ 0.21