< Page:Harvard Law Review Volume 5.djvu
This page needs to be proofread.
402
HARVARD LAW REVIEW.
402
402
HAR YARD LA W RE VIE W. case, for Mr. Justice Rapallo made the surprising statement that the trustee's contention had never been sanctioned by any decision. Holland v. Alcock was followed in O'Connor v. Gifford 1 and Reed v. Williams. 2 Hence the subsequent failure of the " Tilden Trust." J. B. Ames. 1 wj N. Y. 275. 8 125 N. Y. 560.
This article is issued from Wikisource. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.