< Page:Petri Privilegium - Manning.djvu
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
CONTENTS.
Effect of the Council already felt in England and in France, p. 5.
On the opportuneness of defining the Infallibility of the Roman Pontiff, p. 25.
Reasons against the definition, 28; Answers to reasons against the definition, 33; Reasons for the definition, 38.
Tradition of the Infallibility of the Roman Pontiff, p. 58.
Statement of the doctrine, 58.
1. Tradition from the Council of Constance to the Council of Chalcedon, 70.
- Gerson, 70; Bishops of France, 71; University of Paris, 72; Stephen, Bishop of Paris, 73; Bradwardine, Archbishop of Canterbury, 73; Clement VI., 74; S. Thomas, 74; S. Bonaventure, 75; Council of Lyons, 75; S. Thomas of Canterbury, 77; S. Anselm, 77; S. Bernard, 78; Anselm of Havelburgh, 78; Synod of Quedlinburgh, 80; Council of Rome, 81; Eighth General Council, 81; Alcuin and Caroline Books, 81; Bishops of Africa, 83; Sixth General Council, 84; Formula of Hormisdas, 85; S. Leo, and Council of Chalcedon, 87.
2. Tradition from the Council of Constance to 1682, 93.
- Opinions of Gerson, 96; Condemnation of Peter de Osma, 99; Faculty of Louvain, 99; Clergy of France, 101.
This article is issued from Wikisource. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.