542 1111

of the Public to believe all they were told (particularly what they werce told in the news- papers), and to pay twice its valuc for every- thing : and they did their duty.

So 1n this wise, when the Publie read the newspapers how he of the knowing cye was a very great and clever man, they went about saying one to another, “ He 1s a very great and clever man. Who is he ?”

And all this while that other person who was quict and had a small business in a back street, and did not ask after the health of the wives and families of them whose duty it was to write pufls in the newspapers ; all this time he had holes in his boots and no jam on his bread. And his hcad was bald, and he had many lines across the forchead ; and his waistcoat was very loosc ; and his name was MRr. TALENT.

Then the Public began to inquire, saying “Who 15 he that has the bright and knowing cye, and what 1s his name? ” For, when one would go about speaking of the greatness of a person, it 1s better that one should know his name ; for, 1f onc docs not know his name, then one must needs identify him in

CYOalkR. rareN,”

some other way, such as saying “ He who wrote so and so,” or, “ He that drew such a picture 75 the which thing is awkward when onc knows nothing of his works, but only knows that he is a great man.

STRANLD

MAGAZINE.

In such wise the Public wished to know his name; for in certain cases, when one of them would say, “He is a great man,” another would say, “ What has he achieved ?” whercat the first must needs say, “I know not: but he is a great man, for the news- paper says so.” Now, 1f the first speaker had but known his name, he might have answered to the question of the second, “Go to, Ignorance! Dost thou not know the works of A?”

50 when the Public said, “ What is his name ? 7 those who wrote puffs in the news- papers replied with one voice, “His name 15 Mr. Talent.”

And this was a strange thing, that they did not reply, “He 1s Mr. Affability,” or Mr. Shaker of the Hand ” 5 but they said, “ Mr, Talent.”

Now when the Public heard this reply they were greatly puzzled ; for the name on the door-plate of him who had the poor little business in a back street was “ Mr. Talent.” So they went to those whose duty it was to write puffs in the newspapers, and sard, “ Is he the brother of him of the back street 27 And those others replied, “ We know of no one mn a back street. We know of no Mr. Talent except him who 15 affable and shakes hands fre- quently, and asks after our families, and drinks with us, and gives us chicken and champagne. There is no other Mr. Talent.”

But the moment they had said chese things they saw that they had forgotten themsclves, and made a shp of the tongue. However, it was all right; for the Public, for all they were puzzled by it did not understand the thing which had been said, being too foolish.

Now, when Mr. Talent, of the back street, heard of all this, he delayed for some time ; and after that wrote a plaintive letter to the cditors of the newspapers, saying that he was Mr. Talent, and the other was not. And the editors said to those whose duty it was to write the puffs: “ Do you know this Mr. Talent, of the back street ? Can he really be Mr. Talent?” And then those others replied: “He cannot be Mr. Talent; for the only Mr. Talent we know always dictates to us what we shall say about his works i the puffs which 1t is our duty to put i the newspapers; and this one