magnetic field was sufficient to deflect the [Greek: beta] rays completely away
from the plate. When the plate was parallel to the opening, there was produced on it an impression, due to the [Greek: alpha] rays alone, which became more and more diffuse as the distance from the opening increased. This distance should not exceed 1 or 2 centimetres on account of the absorption of the rays in air. If, during the exposure, the magnetic field is reversed for equal lengths of time, on developing the plate two images of the [Greek: alpha] rays are observed which are deflected in opposite directions. This deviation, even in a strong field, is small though quite appreciable and is opposite in sense to the deviation observed for the [Greek: beta] or cathodic rays from the same material.
M. Becquerel[1], by the same method, found that the [Greek: alpha] rays from polonium were deviated in the same direction as the [Greek: alpha] rays from radium; and thus that they also consist of projected positive bodies. In both cases, the photographic impressions were sharply marked and did not show the same diffusion which always appears in photographs of the [Greek: beta] rays.
90. Electrostatic deviation of the [Greek: alpha] rays. If the rays
are charged bodies, they should be deflected in passing through a
strong electric field. This was found by the writer to be the case,
but the electric deviation is still more difficult to detect than the
magnetic deviation, as the intensity of the electric field must of
necessity be less than that required to produce a spark in the
presence of radium. The apparatus was similar to that employed
for the magnetic deviation (Fig. 32) with this exception, that the
brass sides which held the plates in position, were replaced by
ebonite. Alternate plates were connected together and charged
to a high potential by means of a battery of small accumulators.
The discharge in the electroscope, due to the [Greek: alpha] rays, was found to
be diminished by application of the electric field. With plates
·055 cm. apart and 4·5 cms. high, the diminution was only 7%
with a P.D. of 600 volts between the slits. With a special arrangement
of plates, with slits only ·01 cm. apart, the discharge was
diminished about 45% with an electric field corresponding to
10,000 volts per cm.
- ↑ Becquerel, C. R. 136, p. 431, 1903.