24

Assume Mars has developed an indigenous civilization of its own, perhaps as seen in Edgar Rice Burroughs' A Princess of Mars.

Much like Earth, Mars' years and days would be significant for any indigenous peoples. These would drive the seasons and daylight periods, such as they are.

But on Earth, there is an intermediate time period that was important from time immemorial: the phases of the Moon. With a period 28 times that of a day, but 1/13 that of a year, the motion of the moon was a good intermediate length unit of time from which, through long evolution, came our modern concepts of month and week.

But on Mars, the moon(s) are nowhere near as prominent as on Earth, and their periods are much shorter. As seen from Mars and measured in Martian days, Phobos will appear and disappear twice a day, Deimos roughly every 2.5 days.

What astronomical phenomenon, visible from the surface of Mars, would replace the Moon's motion as an intermediate measure of time?

Note: Not a duplicate of this, because this question presupposes indigenous Martians, not Earth colonists; and because this question is not about an 'ideal' calendar, but astronomical phenomena.

a4android
  • 38,445
  • 8
  • 54
  • 143
kingledion
  • 85,387
  • 29
  • 283
  • 483
  • 14
    Why would they have to have a measure of months? They could simply have seasons, quarters of the year. Or they could group every tenth, sixteenth, twenty-second, or any arbitrary group of sols. There's really no reason they can't have a completely arbitrary grouping of sols. After all, weeks are arbitrary. – Phiteros Dec 20 '17 at 01:25
  • 2
    @Phiteros Sounds like an answer. Why not write it up? Remember, I'm asking for an astronomical phenomenon, not an arbitrary measure of time. – kingledion Dec 20 '17 at 02:25
  • 3
    @Phiteros Weeks are based on phases of the moon. They are not arbitrary. – Deepak Dec 20 '17 at 07:28
  • 1
    @Deepak The month is based on phases of the moon. Days of the week are not. Most believe the reason we have 7 days in a week are because of biblical or cultural reasons. – Phiteros Dec 20 '17 at 07:30
  • @Phiteros Not according to this source: https://www.timeanddate.com/calendar/days/7-days-week.html In fact, the wiki you quoted mentions that it is possible that the Judaic week came from the Babylonians (who based it on lunation). However, it seems contentious. The point is: it is possible (and indeed plausible) that the week is based on lunar phase, so it cannot be declared to be arbitrary. (I was also incorrect in asserting that the week is definitely based on the lunar cycle. Point is, we can't be sure). – Deepak Dec 20 '17 at 07:46
  • What do Earthians use to measure Hours? Minutes? Weeks? Centuries? Fractions of a larger unit, or multiples of a smaller unit. – Peter Dec 20 '17 at 14:49
  • 1
    @Deepak: The native Roman week had eight days, and quite obviously no relationship with the monthly lunar cycles. The seven day week was introduced from the east in the first centuries of the common era, and never ever had a relationship with the months of the Julian calendar, or with the lunar months of the Hebrew calendar. – AlexP Dec 20 '17 at 16:20
  • Romans also didn't have months during the winter at first...which is why months named Seven, Eight, Nine, and Ten are actually months 9, 10, 11, and 12....... – user3067860 Dec 20 '17 at 20:50
  • 1
    @user3067860 what? The extra months (July, August) were named after emperors and added to the summer... – kingledion Dec 20 '17 at 20:52
  • 1
    @kingledion Wikipedia says otherwise: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_calendar#Legendary_10-month_calendar January and February were the added months. July and August were just renamed months. – user3067860 Dec 20 '17 at 20:56
  • @user3067860 That section in wikipedia is literally titled 'legendary.' – kingledion Dec 20 '17 at 21:00
  • @kingledion No problem, but are you arguing that they didn't have 10 months ever (could be), or that they had 10 months but the months added were July and August (definitely not, well documented historically)? – user3067860 Dec 20 '17 at 21:15

5 Answers5

36

Please remember that time is an arbitrary concept

Without any outside influence, the very first basis of time is the "day" consisting of a period of "light" and a period of "no light" that we Earthers more commonly know as "night."

  • Day = one Light + one No Light

According to Space.com, the moons of Mars are so close to Mars that they cannot be seen from some latitudes.

...the bulge of Mars' own curvature gets in the way!

Deimos would appear to rise in the east and set in the west.... very.... slowly... while Phobos would appear to rise in the west and set in the east several times each "day". Worst of all, because of their closeness to Mars and the speeds of orbit, they have phases, but the phases occur much faster than we Earthers see with our own Moon.

Not that they're very visible. Deimos would appear to be only 1/19th the size of Luna in the Martian sky and Phobos would look like a slightly oversized Venus. Somewhat unimpressive.

Which means Martians might not develop the concept of a "month" at all.

Due to the orbit around the Sun and the Martian's ability to watch the stars, the concept of a "year" would develop. With the discovery of Mars' orbit, you would eventually discover the two solstices and two equinoxs, which means Mars is (perhaps) more likely to develop "quarters" as a replacement for "months". Kinda...since the orbit is elliptical the periods between solstice and equinox aren't equal.

As for periods shorter than the "light" and "no light" periods, that's REALLY ARBITRARY. Considering Earthers have ten toes and ten fingers it's a wonder they came up with two twelve-hour periods. But that might have been because the ancient Egyptians had two 10-hour periods plus two one-hour periods for twilight.

How many toes do your Martians have?

EDIT: Apparently there are some people who think the details are really, really important. They're not thinking from the Martians' point of view.

  • 1 Martian Year = 1 orbit around the sun = "Year"
  • 1 "light period" + 1 "dark period" = 1 "day"
  • 667.99 "days" or just 668 days = 1 "year"1
  • My Martians' have five fingers and one thumb and four bones per-finger, for 20 bones per "period" of a day for a 40 hour day. (Since hours weren't developed for astronomical reasons on Earth, I see no reason why they must be astronomically-based on Mars.)
  • My Martian's have a religious requirement to rest on the 11th day so their week is 11 days long. Luckily, their pantheon has 15 gods, so each day of the week is named for one of them as are the two equinox and two solstice days.
  • Since Phobos would only appear like a fast-moving planet in the sky, the Martians really don't pay any mind to it (other than for historical purposes. They really did think it was a planet for a long time! Their astrolabes describing its "planetary" motion were very complex!).

  • Deimos, on the other hand, orbits Mars every 107 "hours"2. It's small and the phases are really hard for almost everyone to see, but it's motion is quite obvious. This caused the Obduracien Religious Wars in 1037 as they'd forgotten the number of hours came from counting bones in their hands and some people wanted to favor a lunar calendar over the traditional and now entirely religously-based Oburacien calendar. After the deaths of hundreds of thousands the scientists and religionists finally agreed that there would be a new division of time, the "month," which consisted of 200 days measured from the coincidence of moon-rise with sun-rise on the same day. To the scientists' great frustration, this lead to the new-age belief that the "lunar morning" of the 167th year brought about an alignment of day, month, and year that was truely harmonious! No one has tried to add the first day of the week to that mess due to a rumor that the scientists were going to use anyone who tried in some kind of acid experiment.


1I was too lazy to care about the ratio of Mars' orbital speed to its rotational speed, so as an Earther, I cheated and worked out the ratio comparison from the Earth numbers.

2Martian hours....

JBH
  • 122,212
  • 23
  • 211
  • 522
  • 1
    The stuff about solstices answers the question. Everything else doesn't answer it at all. -1 The question is "What astronomical phenomenon would replace the moon as an intermediate measure of time." Please edit this into a real answer. – kingledion Dec 20 '17 at 01:45
  • 4
    This is the answer I would have written, except better written and with more orbital mechanics. – sphennings Dec 20 '17 at 02:10
  • 10
    The Babylonians used base 60 and you can count to 12 on one hand (use your thumb to count bones in the fingers). 12s and 60s make more sense from that side. – Separatrix Dec 20 '17 at 09:15
  • 12
    Isn't the main reason for 12 that it is divisible by 2, 3 and 4 ? So if 2, 3 or 4 people want to divide something, it's much easier than using the decimal system? Similar with 60, and 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. – vsz Dec 20 '17 at 11:07
  • 1 for the pleasure of reading about the orbital mechanics
  • – ToFo Dec 20 '17 at 12:46
  • 4
    @kingledion, were you feeling persnickity yesterday? What makes you think planetary rotation isn't an "astronomical phenomenon" or that the astronomical phenomenon of the moons wouldn't justify the creation of a month? – JBH Dec 20 '17 at 14:21
  • @JBH In my question I talk about years, days, and the moons, and dismiss all of them. 80% of this question is just rehashing what I said in the question. – kingledion Dec 20 '17 at 15:03
  • 2
    And the reason for 12 months is because our calendar system came from one that used to have 10 months, but a couple of Caesars decided to jam in an extra month just for themselves. Which is why September (sept = 7), October (oct =8), November (nov = 9), December (dec=10) don't match the number month they are. All because Julius had to have July and Augustus had to have August. – Shufflepants Dec 20 '17 at 15:06
  • 6 is perfect number, 12 is sublime one. No wonder they were chosen because they divide so well. 10 is pretty bad at it, that's why nobody wanted it before calculators and easy fractions. So, you take a unit that's given by nature (day and year) and you divide it into number of subunits that's comfortable to work with: 6,12, 60. Those numbers are good in any-base system. – Agent_L Dec 20 '17 at 15:21
  • 2
    @kingledion, you didn't dismiss any of them. You only remarked about the differences. If you want a more specific answer, be more specific about your questions. – JBH Dec 20 '17 at 15:34
  • 1
    I really like this answer, because there's an 'arbitrary' time system right here! In my mind the 'point' of the last 2/3 or so is "look at this time system I just made up from a few details my people know". This is a really good example of building a plausible system out of relatively little information. – levelonehuman Dec 20 '17 at 21:01
  • 3
    @kingledion What JBH hinted at is right on. "Time" is a man made concept. WE MADE IT UP. Get creative--the martians in whatever you are doing can have crazy reasons for whatever measurements of time they want. – Jeff.Clark Dec 20 '17 at 23:40
  • @Jeff.Clark Hmmm...yet the question still reads "What astronomical phenomenon...." – kingledion Dec 20 '17 at 23:41
  • Ok @kingledion, don't have fun with it. It's up to you. – Jeff.Clark Dec 21 '17 at 16:53