3

If we had an earth like planet except it had a 50 - 100 percent bigger radius than our earth what are some ways that it could have have similar gravity when compared to our own planet?

P.S. Atmospheric pressure is the same as earth

user
  • 28,950
  • 16
  • 108
  • 217
Christopher Void
  • 1,122
  • 6
  • 19
  • 1
    Half the density would be a good start – nzaman Mar 29 '18 at 16:30
  • 2
    What does 50% or 100% bigger mean? 1.5 to 2 times the volume of Earth, 1.5 to 2 times the surface area of Earth, 1.5 to 2 times the mass of Earth, or 1.5 to 2 times the radius of Earth? – AlexP Mar 29 '18 at 16:30
  • Simply change the composition of the planet, use heavier or lighter liquids and metals... for example the earth is mostly iron – Ekaen Mar 29 '18 at 16:30
  • AlexP I think i fixed the question for you – Christopher Void Mar 29 '18 at 16:32
  • There is no unique linkage between the atmospheric pressure and the mass or radius of the planet. Atmospheric pressure depends on the radius and mass of the planet, and on the mass of gas composing the atmosphere, and on the temperature of said gas. So the second part of the question is trivial -- just declare that the atmospheric pressure is the same as on Earth. Gravitational acceleration on the surface of a planet is proportional to the radius and density; so if the radius is 1.5 times that of Earth, density must be 0.67 that of Earth. Less iron, more aluminosilicates. – AlexP Mar 29 '18 at 16:34
  • Please limit a post to one question at a time. The part about similar gravity is one, the part about a hollow world is another. – The Square-Cube Law Mar 29 '18 at 16:50
  • Ok, i guess i got a bit ambitious with this question ill just ask the second separately later – Christopher Void Mar 29 '18 at 16:51
  • 6
  • I'll take a look at that question and see if the conclusions are what i was wanting to know, thanks! – Christopher Void Mar 29 '18 at 16:52
  • I'm not sure you can have 1.5-2.0 Earth radii and still have the planet be "Earth-like", especially if in the term you also include that it is to have similar surface gravity. I think that implies simply too much mass. – user Mar 30 '18 at 22:02
  • earth like meaning oceans and a breathable atmosphere mainly, i see no reason why replacing some materials with lighter ones or doing something else to lower the planets density – Christopher Void Mar 31 '18 at 00:59
  • Since I didnt see it as an answer yet, could the planet be doughnut shaped? Doughnut shaped planets are perfectly viable regarding gravity issues, and since the center is made of void, for the same gravity the radius will be bigger. – Richard Apr 13 '18 at 12:00

3 Answers3

2

If you increase the radius, you actually have to increase the mass of the planet in order to feel the same gravity at the surface. Newton's equation for gravity is dependent on the radius between the center of two masses (say, the planet and a person standing on it):

$$ F_g = \frac{G m_1 m_2}{r^2} $$

If we want the force of gravity ($F_g$) to be the same for a planet with double the radius of Earth, we get an equation that looks like this:

$$ \frac{G m_1 m_2}{r^2} = \frac{G m_1 m_3}{(2r)^2} $$

where $m_1$ is the mass of our object on the planet's surface, $m_2$ is the mass of Earth, $m_3$ is the unknown mass of our new planet, $r$ is the radius of Earth, and $G$ is our gravitational constant. We can divide $G$ and $m_1$ from both sides to get

$$ \frac{m_2}{r^2} = \frac{m_3}{(2r)^2} $$

$$ m_3 = m_2 (\frac{2r}{r})^2 $$

$$ m_3 = m_2 2^2 $$

So the mass of planet with twice the radius of Earth would have to be four times the mass of Earth to have the same gravity at the surface. A planet with a 50% larger radius would have to have 2.25 times the mass. However, if you were to double the planet's radius, you would increase its volume 8 times while increasing its mass 4 times so you would have to halve its density. This might be achieved by replacing a significant amount of the iron in the Earth's mantle with magnesium and aluminum (maybe, I'm not a geologist).

The atmospheric pressure would be the same under these conditions, assuming that the height of the atmosphere were the same. But that being said, having larger characteristic length scales and curvature would change the way that weather occurs on this planet, which is to say I imagine it would be more boring. Probably not too much, though.

Ryan Clare
  • 130
  • 5
2

If the planet had twice the radii of the Earth (2 x 6378 km), the planet would have to have 4 times the mass in order to have the same acceleration due to gravity on the surface.

The formula for acceleration due to gravity is:

$$g = \frac{G * M}{R^2}$$

Where:

g is the acceleration due to gravity.
G is the Universal Gravitational Constant (G)
M is the mass of the object (e.g. planet)
R is the distance to the center of mass of the object

Secespitus
  • 17,743
  • 9
  • 75
  • 111
Kurt Heckman
  • 159
  • 5
0

Gravity is about mass not size, so if the planet was made of less dense materials it would have less gravity in relation to it's size.

Easiest way would probably be to replace some of it's iron core with something less dense, or just give it a smaller iron core. (I'm assuming you want an iron core so that it will have a magnetic field to shield it from being sun fry)

Atmospheric pressure is not directly related to size or gravity either, Venus is comparable in size to Earth but has a much greater atmospheric pressure by many magnitudes.

Kilisi
  • 26,524
  • 1
  • 36
  • 104
  • 1
    The formula for gravitational force includes mass and the square of the distance. The size of a planet determines the surface's distance from the center, so size does matter. – Kyle A Apr 04 '18 at 04:51
  • @KyleA good point, I was trying to keep it very simple since the OP doesn't seem to know a lot about it. – Kilisi Apr 04 '18 at 07:11
  • Atmospheric pressure does have a direct relationship with gravity. First, pressure is force divided by area. In the case of atmospheric pressure, the force is gravitational. Greater gravity = greater pressure. Also, pressure with height changes according to the hydrostatic balance (dP/dz = density*g). So a higher gravity planet would have higher surface pressure and a shallower curve of pressure decrease with altitude. – Ryan Clare Apr 20 '18 at 03:29
  • @RyanClare I'll bow to your more indepth knowledge. – Kilisi Apr 23 '18 at 03:15