5

I am currently writing a species for my story that can self generate UV radiation by consuming cinnabar/mercury ore, being immune to mercury poisoning, converting the mercury into a vapor that interacts with a 300 watt electrical current in their body. This produces UV radiation similarly to how a mercury vapor lamp does. Phosphors in their skin interact with this radiation, causing them to emit visible UV light. This light is absorbed by them in a pseudo-photosynthetic process to produce energy reserves. Their body also naturally produces vitamin D as a result.

On their planet, their sun has died out, no longer providing them with sunlight, forcing them to burrow deep underground towards the heated core of the planet while the surface freezes over. The conflict of the story being that the core is cooling and they need to find a new planet to settle on.

They have adapted to using cinnabar as a way to produce and absorb UV radiation in the absence of sunlight. They get their water source from underground lakes and have managed to set up crops by using their UV light to help them grow, which these alien plants thrive in UV light. They harness this radiation, using it to project a UV laser from their eye for self defense against predators and for welding, etc. They also possess UV vision for seeing well in certain conditions.

Does this seem plausible enough and how can I expand on this?

L.Dutch
  • 286,075
  • 58
  • 587
  • 1,230
  • Hi. Welcome to Worldbuilding. I'm not sure what you mean by "how can I expand on this?" Do you intend that to ask something specific? Or is it just a general call? If the latter, one might argue that it is Too Broad or too Story-based for this site. Either is a close reason, so you may want to consider if you can make it more specific or if you should remove it. – Brythan Jun 24 '19 at 04:48
  • Welcome to the site ViolaVerse, when you have a few minutes, please take the [tour] and read up in our [help] about how we work: [ask]. Plausible in what sense? Scientifically (you added the [tag:science-based] tag)? You seem to have proposed several steps in your reasoning away from the central premise of self-generating UV. Here we encourage a "one question per question, with a set of criteria that enable us do determine a single best answer". That's the model. – Escaped dental patient. Jun 24 '19 at 04:50
  • 1
    Here's a related question which isn't a duplicate, but might give you some ideas about how life without a sun might actually work. Realistically, the thing you need to know is that photosynthesis is an endothermic reaction, meaning that it stores energy in a chemical form, whereas normal life based metabolisms are exothermic reactions, taking that stored energy and releasing it for use by the life form. It's that endothermic reaction you need to replace in your biosphere. – Tim B II Jun 24 '19 at 04:54
  • 1
    Since radioactive refers to the emission of radiation via nuclear transition, and UV is not emitted by such path, I have modified your title. – L.Dutch Jun 24 '19 at 05:27
  • 1
    You've mistaken mercury vapour for a material that has somehow stored energy and releases it as UV when stimulated. Alas, it merely helps convert the energy released by an electrical discharge into a form useful for producing light. – Starfish Prime Jun 24 '19 at 05:30
  • @StarfishPrime the light from mercury vapour lamps produces UV radiation, but the outer bulb provides protection against it, which I've based their internal process on mercury vapour lamps – AnonymousAuthor1999 Jun 24 '19 at 11:23
  • @ViolaVerse the issue your assumption that the light could be absorbed to build up energy reserves. Thing is, the emission of UV doesn't generate energy, it merely uses energy you're already expending. You can't re-absorb energy you're using up yourself and expect to live very long. If you get rid of the bit where they photosynthesise, that objection goes away. – Starfish Prime Jun 24 '19 at 11:26
  • @StarfishPrime I do see the fault in that, I'm getting rid of the photosynthesis part entirely. I appreciate the feedback I've gotten so far! :) – AnonymousAuthor1999 Jun 24 '19 at 11:33
  • @starfishprime currently, for the infants, I have made it so they photosynthesize the light from their parents for sustenance, is that still plausible? Or does it face the same issue? They aren't generating any UV themselves. Then again, like you said, it doesn't really hold any energy. – AnonymousAuthor1999 Jun 24 '19 at 11:37
  • @ViolaVerse that's a neat idea... I like it, but it won't work in anything but a very soft scifi setting. Inefficiencies in generating the light and inefficiencies in converting it into useful work at the other end will mean that it won't ever compete with the old mammalian solution, alas. – Starfish Prime Jun 24 '19 at 12:32
  • @ViolaVerse Good science fiction doesn't try to explain the unexplainable. Either find a reasonably realistic process that you can actually explain it - or - just don't try to explain it at all. I (personally) cannot stand sci-fi that makes up BS that cannot possibly work and then attempts to explain it with a straight face. Please don't do that. Good sci-fi avoids the problem by not going there. – xxbbcc Jun 24 '19 at 18:29

2 Answers2

7

First things first, there is no such a thing as

Phosphors in their skin interact with this radiation, causing them to emit visible UV light.

UV light is called like this because it is Ultra Violet, from the Latin beyond the violet (of the spectrum). It follows that UV light cannot be visible.

Semantic issues apart, what really puzzles in your description is the following:

a vapor that interacts with a 300 watt electrical current in their body.

together with

This light is absorbed by them in a pseudo-photosynthetic process to produce energy reserves.

If they can already produce a 300 W discharge, why put on this complicated scheme? Every process has a lower than 1 yield, thus if you have to build a chain of processes, the less the processes, the better for the overall yield. To make this clear, consider a process which has a yield of 90%. If you put two of such processes in series, the overall yield will be $0.9 \times 0.9 = 0.81$.

Last but not least, if they dwell underground, IR is a better choice than UV. IR being emitted by hot bodies, it would allow them to see everywhere, while UV would be limited to where they can cast light.

And as an overall remark: if they are the energy source of this underground world (plant thriving on the UV emission of these organisms), they cannot survive getting energy from the world itself. Thermodynamics is a nasty mistress.

L.Dutch
  • 286,075
  • 58
  • 587
  • 1,230
  • UV light is visible if you have the right sort of receptors in your eyes. Insects, birds and reindeer can see into the ultraviolet part of the spectrum. – DrBob Jun 26 '19 at 09:36
2

So, this is really just to mop up the details as L. Dutch's answer covers the major problems.

TL;DR: UV is hard to generate and hard to work with. Inefficiencies in the system will make it useless for farming, and dangerous for the user to do anything else other than glow prettily. Sorry about that.


generate UV radiation by consuming cinnabar/mercury ore, converting the mercury into a vapor that interacts with a 300 watt electrical current in their body. This produces UV radiation similarly to how a mercury vapor lamp does.

Mercury vapour lights don't consume that much mercury... it is only lost when the bulb breaks. You won't need a cinnabar rich diet unless you're doing a bad job at sealing your vapour bladders. That is of course up to you as an author, but bear in mind that a species who continuously leak mercury into the environment around them are likely to be unhealthy for other lifeforms in their proximity who aren't similarly immune to mercury poisoning!

So anyway, your species presumably has some gas bladders lined with mercury vapour secreting glands and some kind of electrical discharge mechanism, whatever that looks like. Remember that mecury vapour lights are arc lamps! Immunity to mercury poisoning doesn't imply immunity to UV damage, so your gas bladders will need to be well lined with a UV-protecting membrane if you want to avoid getting glow-in-the-dark sarcomas. They'll also get hot; the process of producing UV isn't perfectly efficient after all, and nor is the conversion of UV to visible light.

Real-world mercury lamps are no more than 10% efficient, I think, so for 300W in you'll get 270W of heat (for comparison, an adult human at rest generates about 100W of heat) so you'll need a decent blood supply to the light organs to stop them cooking their owners. A blood clot could have serious consequences if they don't have effective voluntary control over the light organs... light organ ischemia might result in serious burns or even fires. Beware of senile old folk!

Phosphors in their skin interact with this radiation, causing them to emit visible UV light.

Emitting visible light is kinda at odds to the next set of requirements, by the way.

set up crops by using their UV light to help them grow, which these alien plants thrive in UV light.

Have a read up on the power requirements of grow lights in greenhouses. I'm seeing figures like "30W per square foot". It isn't clear whether luminous efficiency is taken into account, but your glowing peeps might only be able to provide enough light for a few square feet of crops, and that isn't going to produce very much food. It certainly won't provide enough food to offset the calorific cost of having a 300W lightsource in your body.

They harness this radiation, using it to project a UV laser from their eye for self defense against predators and for welding, etc.

UV lasers are super inefficient. Like probably less than 1%. They'll also use a whole different set of chemicals and optics to your UV lights. To produce enough energy to weld is likely to need kilowatts of power, and to do that organically is going to need a pretty hefty appetite, and it'll produce an awful lot of heat which will need specialist radiators or an aquatic habitat to sink. The lasing mediums are often pretty reactive and toxic (lots of lovely halides in there) and would be quite difficult and hazardous to keep in an organic housing.

Focussing and directing UV light precisely enough for metalwork will require some pretty funky looking organic optics, too. I'm not sure how big they'd need to be, but you might start needing a head like Giger's alien.

As a defense... well, you don't need many watts to blind someone, but if you were intending to zap predators with deadly eye beams you'll run straight back into that thermal inefficiency problem with kilowatt power draws and heat outputs. Really, you'd be more effective if you used all that energy to drive massive muscles and threw rocks instead!

Starfish Prime
  • 74,426
  • 11
  • 150
  • 313