This might be possible if all three moons are in an orbital resonance with one another - that is, their periods are integer multiples of each other. For example, to fit your desired timescales you could have the periods be 1 week (Moon 1), 2 weeks (Moon 2), and 4 weeks (Moon 3); then the periods are related by $P_3=2P_2=4P_1$, and we have what we call a 1:2:4 resonance. This guarantees that all three moons will be full moons at the same time every four weeks (so roughly one month in Earth's Moon terms). We see resonances arise with many moons of Jupiter and Saturn, and it actually can help stabilize their orbits - Ganymede, Europa and Io are locked in a 1:2:4 resonance.
Is this feasible? Well, let's look at Kepler's third law. For a circular orbit, it tells us that the orbital radius $r$ is related to the period $P$ by
$$P^2\propto r^3$$
The innermost moon would have a period one quarter the period of our Moon, and would therefore have an orbital radius approximately 39% that of our Moon; the middle moon would have an orbital radius of about 62% that of our Moon's. We could argue that, even with the stabilizing resonance, the moons might be too close to one another to be stable; the closest approach between any two would be 88,000 km, compared to the roughly 240,000 km separation of Europa and Io.
The other problem is tides, which would, yes, be a bit more complicated. In fact, as the tidal force scales as $F_T\propto M/r^{3}$, I calculate that the tidal force on the Earth would be, at peak, 21 times the current value. That's a lot, yes, though it could be mitigated by decreasing the mass of the moons - which would have the added benefit of decreasing the strength of their gravitational interactions with one another.