Pretend I'm writing a novel about a how a beaver takes over the world: What food/s may/might/(grammar?) no longer be consumed by humans or at least consumed less?
Edit 1: I was wondering if anyone would google this. This is from The Big Bang Theory S04E03. The 2 askers, Amy and Sheldon, claim is that there exists a unique answer 'cheese Danish'. However the answerer Leonard guessed cinnamon and gave a really good YET SIMPLE/ELEGANT/SUCCINCT explanation.
I wanted to see others' opinions and so I made this question into like writing a novel.
The ff is one of the comments I got (pretty much the same answer as Leonard):
Wood. All wood goes to holy beavers. Potencial to deduce things in the A for the q is quite low, if there is something to deduce scientifically at all. Opinion based vtc, hm? Extencion defining properties of those beavers may or may not be an improvement for the q. – MolbOrg
Genius question/observation comments:
-
I don't get why some foods woukld no longer be consumed in a world ruled by an intelligent beaver in the first place. The question should be edited to explain why promoting an intelligent beaver to the position of world emperor would lead to some foods becoming unavailable. – AlexP 5 hours ago
-
It's not clear to me : What is the relationship between the beaver-se and the human-iverse? Is it equal on equal, humans fighting for their survival against bearzillas, or are humans down to the level of animals (think "Planet of the apes")...? What do you mean by "giant"? There can be wide changes just because of that :) Tortliena
Edit 2: Why off-topic? i mean really suppose i'm writing a novel about such a beaver. then the plot is about how humans rebel. and then it's a subplot that humans in general miss a certain kind of food because the beaver took it away. MolbOrg's comment got 5 upvotes. I say we let it be the accepted answer.