Look at physics - everything they can measure in every possible way/combination can be a sense.
You forgot hot cold, electromagnetic stuff(some birds), quantum mechanics stuff also can be measured observed have sensors.
Your biggest problem is that you try to describe humans, it general problem, for multiple reasons when aliens are just humans in a different wrapping, and one of the reasons are the purpose of writing, the reader, a human understands things in the bit which they know and when bits are of a different system it very hard for them to do so.
Considering your question and examples I would not recomend that you go this creation route or expect some good breaktrougths, focus on language it challengin enough by itself. And in general, scify does not have that many successeful examples when ppl did get some good results in that direction of creating creatures with extended or different world view pictures based on their all including senses.
More or less sucesseful examples were a result of their professional knowledge (like ehopraxia) or were done in not a descriptive form but in a form of thinking what it is what it can be what is the difference like solaris as an example, or asimov robots(also sort of aliens). Mm there were also few others, but I can't remember their author names and titles of their works.
Others of a more or less sucesseful kind they were pictures without much of explanations or much knowledge about their nature, for reasons authors were not that much capable of to provide it and when they did try to do so it was not necessarly as good as the initial idea itself, as initial picture - like borgs of startrek, or aliens or predators.
There is an asian stuf which is less known maybe or indian myths or stuff which also did try to expand senses like different cultivators(asian china stuff), which in a sense also are aliens which senses expanding beyond typical, or indian myths of gods and super creatures like Mahabharata stories. (Btw Roger Zelazny had a good one transition on human cognition in a setting of indian gods, do not recall the title).
Babel-17, Samuel Delany which mention in @LSerni is one of those I tried to remember, it a great stuf, if you haven't read it then it almost obligatory to read.
Whole buddism in a sense is actually about new words and concepts of senses if you looking for some inspirations, lol.
If you want to expand/focus on that beyond human aspect - you have what it takes, or not and no amount of explanation helps you. Because if you want to see alien life or senses or wolrd view which is different - one does not need aliens, look around the life we have there, there are tons of examples of creatures with differences like with 12 types of rodopsing not like 3 we have, or who see ligth polarisations, or who navigate by stars(some insects), or who have 40 definitions for snow(some homosapiens), or who call everyone a fish(homosapiens again) etc.
Things which outside our scope are all around us, or close to us in different societies, so as well in the people who have different knowledge and who look at things differently(in different countries or in the same). So if you need an inspiration, then do not ask for it, but just look around.
If you like to focus on linguistic aspects, then focus on it and linguisic materials, like which languages there are (there are many, some are funny as like whistle language, but there are more) enough of differences which can provide certain inspirations as well because they are reflection of worldview of those who used them, especially languages of small nations and such. I mean there are plenty of materials here to be inspiered with.
I personaly recomend, for expansion and forming a base for inspirations to read random antropology stuf, a little of everything, maybe with some more focus (later) on their linguisitic aspects. When you look at thing from a perspective of modent history of past 60million years, it really puts a lot of things in a different perspective of what can or can not be, what is fundamentally important and what is just recent stuff, and what it means to develop a language in a way.
Evolution in general and evolution simulations of your liking also can be on that recomenndation list for to form a base for thinking of what can or can not be, also forming some empirica rules and understanding how things develop.
In sense of those basic stuf, antropology and evolition, help see things around.
Your uncertainty about sour and sweet it looks funny, sweet is sweet because we run on the stuf, and if it would be the sour we run on it would be sweet. Sour and sweet are not objective categories, they are empirical ones while fear(run) or figth are fundamental ones for evolved creature, which did evolve in a survivial game.
Hope may or may not be a fundamental things for intelligent life(for a sufficiently sofisticated one), as hope it is a part of a fantasy and believe system/corpus, which is part of a game intellegent creatures do play at some point and which trains develops their brains and such. But hope not necessarly has to be as a direct concept and it can be split in different set of concepts, it is a result, a mental bit of this specific implementation for some nations but is not the only way to describe anticipation, and it may not be required, or can be replaced by "I expect probability 0-100%, or uncertain probability"(or something like that).
Try google "neural networks animal language" there are some interesting links, but beside that I have seen(recent news) some project which wants to achieve some level of translation of animal "language" - it quite interesting to think about challenges they will face on level of mismatching concepts.
Idk man, maybe some will have a better inspiring stuff or tips, but for me it looks like - if you ask for a price of it, you do not have enough money.