5

I am trying to think of a good way for an effectively all-powerful organization to preserve humanity's knowledge for when the inevitable apocalypse happens so that, when the time comes for survivors to rebuild the ruins of society, they will at least have all of the knowledge that their ancestors have had until this point. Now, one ideal that the organization aspires to is that, whatever means of preserving information they use, a chimpanzee should be able to understand it. Of course, that is not always possible.

Here are the criteria for a method of preserving the knowledge of humanity:

  • The storage medium must not be such that it requires advanced infrastructure to access the data. So, anything that requires an atomic force microscope to read is right out.
  • The information storage system must be able to contain truly vast amounts of data. We're talking probably the entirety of Google Patents, probably most of the papers in scientific journals, plus copious amounts of technical manuals describing things such as how various machinery is built, how to make the tools needed to make the tools needed to build said machinery are build, ore smelting techniques, the composition of water to use for the concrete, etc. Essentially, absolutely nothing can be left to the mercy of "It's so blindingly obvious, we don't need to write it down" or "They'll work it out themselves".
  • It cannot be assumed that the survivors will speak the same language as that used in writing down the information or that they will be able to translate it by themselves.
  • It should be able to last a long time.

My only idea so far has been to have the needed information preserved by having it engraved into plates of titanium and have several "Rosetta Stones" made that have words alongside pictograms explaining their meaning so that translation of the stored info would be possible, all stored in underground vaults. Does anyone have better ideas?

user73910
  • 823
  • 7
  • 9
  • 4
    Does this answer your question? How might modern humans leave a message for 50,000 years? There's also 1, 2, 3, 4 and more. This has been a popular question here. It's always worth searching the Stack before posting a question. – JBH Mar 18 '23 at 03:11
  • 1
    Does "all the knowledge" really mean ALL the knowledge? Celebrity gossip? Videos of mean cats? Old weather forecasts for the Antarctic ocean? Speeches by demagogues to local rotary clubs? The trivial differences between types of mens' hats? – user535733 Mar 18 '23 at 10:31
  • So far, when civilization collapsed, a different civilization developed. Perhaps instead of preserving knowledge, we simply preserve some humans who will have curiosity and thus, build a new civilization based on the resources available at that time. – David R Mar 18 '23 at 14:12
  • There are problems with "truly vast amounts of data:" Most of that data will be junk: Decades of lab reports on the fruitless search for Phlogistin. Junk patents never used. Centuries of research papers and PhD theses that never went anywhere. Eugenics and other useless blind alleys. "Vast amounts of data" suggests an assumption that scholars after the apocalypse to sort the jems from the dreck will be more plentiful and cheap than they are now. – user535733 Mar 19 '23 at 04:11
  • If they are an all-powerful organisation then by definition they can prevent any apocalypse, or create a nice tame apocalypse that people can start recovering from in a hundred years using the books in their climate-controlled library. 2. AFAIK we can't create written / pictographic instructions that chimpanzees will follow for building any object at all without in-person instruction, so that aspiration seems doomed before it starts.
  • – KerrAvon2055 Mar 20 '23 at 01:08