54

Trying to create horns which are both ornamental and defensive, I've read somewhere that beards evolved in humans because we punch each other so much that even just a minuscule amount of hair cushion can make the difference between you dying with a broken jaw or surviving with a few broken teeth but no internal bleeding. With these in mind, one would think that human males are min-maxed for violence.

I'm trying to push the meta even further beyond, by giving people horns; each horn is pointy, and these pointy horns also have sharp and pointy protuberances. In real life if you punch someone barehanded and hit their chin, unless you are considerably heavier than your opponent, you are more likely to crush your own fingers and break them against the sharp jawline of your adversary. Or at least it happens more often when both the victim and the aggressor weigh the same: that's kind of the point of why boxers use gloves.

Following this logic, the jaw horns follow the jawline and then bend down both to expose the pointy protuberances forward and to cover part of the neck.

The top horns exist to block attacks from predators. Historically predators used to pounce on people from behind and bite them in the top of the head.

The prototype also shows some smaller barbs on the neck, which I will remove and place with a 2D textured version but the concept still remains.

I want the horns to be made of either dentine or iron-enriched bone, like the teeth of beavers or scaly foot gastropods.

As of now, there are 8 big horns; can it get up to 16 before it becomes unliveable? What am I trying to achieve? Basically these situations:

  • You hit this person with a sword in the head; your sword gets stuck between the horns and then she proceeds to beat you with your own weapon.

  • You punch her face; your fist bleeds and breaks.

  • You kick her face; you don't walk any more.

  • You watched too much Twilight and want to bite her neck; her neck bites back.

enter image description here

Also, the rest of the body will be covered in external bony round/flat plates, of the same materials as the horns; it will cover mostly the thighs, back, belly, shins, forearms and chest

  • 22
    Beards are a sexual display, not defence. – Monty Wild Aug 12 '23 at 01:45
  • 94
    +1 just for the title and doing a great job of completely subverting my expectations. – JBH Aug 12 '23 at 03:34
  • 1
    How do they sleep? – biziclop Aug 12 '23 at 09:47
  • 1
    @biziclop probably hugging a futon. –  Aug 12 '23 at 09:51
  • 14
    Just FYI the beard cushion thing did not stand up to testing. – John Aug 12 '23 at 14:10
  • 1
    The horns could also be poisonous. Maybe not a lethal poison (that would be too dangerous) but something that would make your opponent sleepy or confused. Or maybe some people have lethal-poisonous horns, and some people have non-poisonous horns, but the non-poisonous horns are imitations of the lethal-poisonous horns, so they act good to dissuade opponents. – Stef Aug 12 '23 at 16:20
  • She needs gaps in the horns in order to see, and in order to eat. Those are a weak point to be exploited. Sword-combat will just have less focus on Slashing (kendo, broadswords, etc) and more on Stabbing (fencing, rapiers, etc) — cycles of combat that we have seen in real-life with the evolution of armour. And, if these humanoids are already developing horns on their head to protect against punches/kicks, why wouldn't they counter-develop claws or horns on their hands/arms/legs to stand up against those head-horns and prevent injury to their limbs? – Chronocidal Aug 12 '23 at 17:48
  • 8
    Any more than four you're supposed to contact your doctor. – Mazura Aug 12 '23 at 18:51
  • 1
    I think the porcupine might provide a better inspiration than the stag beetle; particularly if the person's quills can lie flat most of the time and only spring up into "defense mode" when the person is feeling attacked. (As a bonus, we already have goosebumps as a vestigial mechanism to do that) – Jeremy Friesner Aug 12 '23 at 20:53
  • 4
    Since you're already aware that human males and females evolved different traits - why would your women have these defensive structures? – pipe Aug 13 '23 at 06:44
  • @MontyWild - A bushy covering for the neck is a key defensive strategy – Richard Aug 13 '23 at 09:36
  • 1
    @MontyWild jack found the study https://academic.oup.com/iob/article/2/1/obaa005/5799080 –  Aug 13 '23 at 11:30
  • 3
    @pipe Why do men have nipples? – wizzwizz4 Aug 13 '23 at 16:00
  • @user104995 Interesting that the study disagreed with the results of a study about knockout rates in MMA fighters with and without beards. Sheep wool was used, and is considerably denser than a human beard, which may be biasing the results. – Monty Wild Aug 13 '23 at 16:06
  • @MontyWild good point about the whool, but it might also be that people with beards have thinier necks thus less neck strength thus less resistance to headshots... kind of the same way people with a bad jawline like Andrew tate grow a beard to hide it, some might grow a beard to hide chicken necks... or maybe having a beard makes your face look more "puncheable" so people are naturally more prone to be more aggressive and punch harder people with beards hahahaha –  Aug 13 '23 at 20:49
  • 1
    @pipe why do women have skulls? why do men have head hair? why do women have hands if men use spears? why do women have calluses? Sexual dymorphism is an option, not a rule. Why do female goats have beards and horns? why do female cows have horns? why are female kangarus muscular? why are female spiders bigger than male spideres? –  Aug 13 '23 at 21:48
  • I expected a comedy, ended up with a legit question. where do I put all this expectation OP!!! – encryptoferia Aug 14 '23 at 02:45

5 Answers5

42

You have the wrong horns for your stated goal of defense.

Long pointed horns a bad for defense, and even worse on the head of a biped. There is a reason humans only ever put horns on ceremonial helmets, they make the head more vulnerable to blows. The horns you have would make weapon attacks against the head MORE likely to injure the head and neck. They provide leverage to the blows and make them more likely to hit the head; there is little chance of getting your weapon caught. Worse, your horns are attached to the weakest part of the skull, so simply cracking the skull wide open is very likely, making them more vulnerable, not less. The lower horns are just as bad - they are attached to the zygomatic arch (literally can't be attached to anything else in that area) which is fairly weak, so a blow will simply rip them off the head along with bone and jaw muscle. This is doubly dangerous as it will prevent them from being able to chew properly.

Even worse, the horns would provide leverage to grab the head, which is a huge liability to a creature with hands - why punch someone when I can just grab their horns and wrench them sideways, twisting the whole head and neck. Some minor cuts on the hand are nothing if I can literally snap their neck or even just knock them off their feet. The last thing you want on an upright biped with a thin neck is easy-to-grab leverage on the head.

The small horns on the neck are fine and may help with defense; something like that has evolved more than once even in mammals. Small widely spaced scales are the best you can get in order to keep neck flexibility. But if your goal is to protect the head, you want broad flat horns - like those of a musk-ox or mouflon. Or you can have lots of tiny interlocking spikes, similar to those of a horny toad. Either would make grabbing or biting the head difficult, and provide a helmet-like extra layer of protection.

The YouTube Unnatural History Channel created a great video about how horns function, titled Spec evo short : the practical uses of horns and antlers. According to their terminology, you seem to have put jousting horns on something that can't use them, so they can only be pure ornamentation. So which is more important to you? If you want the shape, they are pure ornamentation and a huge disadvantage in a fight. If you want the function, you need a drastically different shape and layout.

Also just FYI small horn covered bones covering the body are called either scutes or scales, depending on which layer of the skin they originate from. Horn, scales, and even hair and feathers are all made of the exact same material, Keratin.

John
  • 80,982
  • 15
  • 123
  • 276
20

You can cover the whole body with sharp, pointy horns if you want... but before you do that, you may need to justify yourself.

How did these horns get there? Did they evolve? If they evolved, what evolutionary pressures led to their evolution? Did the ancestor species have horns that could have evolved into these horns? Maybe they were bioengineered...

However, you need to consider the cost. Babies can't be born with horns, otherwise they and their mothers will die in childbirth, so they have to grow later. Growing horns has a cost, the most basic cost being a higher protein intake required to feed the growth of the horns. However, that's not the only cost. Humans engage in body contact a lot for social bonding, and lots of horns are going to make a person literally too prickly to hug or kiss... so you're going to have to change fundamental social bonding rituals.

Also, if these horns evolved, the environment would have to be so hostile that any negative pressures from looking different and feeling prickly to the individuals' mates would be outweighed by the increased survivability of the individuals.

Then, don't forget that evolution is slow. It might take millions of years for horns such as these to evolve... has there been time? Are these 'horny hominids' even human any more, and would they need to be? It's far more likely that, given that no hominids, apes or primates have horns, some other mechanism of defence or avoidance of injury might evolve than horns.

This puts the question of horned hominids into the realm of traits that have appeared as the result of bioengineering or magic. If that's the case, then the limits of how many horns the hominid can bear comes down to practicalities of their protein intake and how social bonding rituals have been modified to allow for this spiky defence.

Your horned humans may be genetically human, but with all those horns and armour, they're going to become a separate species pretty quickly, since regular humans and these people are going to see the others as being pretty different and unapproachable.

Then don't forget that all this horn has weight. Your horned hominids are going to need either more muscle to carry it all, or they are going to need lower muscle-joint lever ratios to allow them to be stronger for a given mass of muscle... which will make them slower. Either way, it's a trade-off... more muscle, needing a higher protein and energy intake... or slower than normal humans, or something in between. You don't get something for nothing.

Further, humans have evolved to have the best cooling system and greatest physical endurance of all terrestrial animals, due to their ability to sweat in order to lose body heat. However, covering the body with horn and adding all that mass would reduce the cooling capacity and increase the body mass, thus reducing endurance. Horned hominids would not be as good at persistence hunting as humans.

Horns are sexual signals for many species, and are in effect saying to potential mates, 'Look at me, I can afford to carry these huge, otherwise useless things around and still be healthy, so I must be good breeding material!' As a rule of thumb, any time a biologist sees a huge, expensive, flamboyant and otherwise useless structure on an animal, sexual selection is probably involved.

TL;DR

So, how horny can humans become? As horny as they can be before less horny humans aren't horny for them any more... at which point, the horny hominids aren't human any more.

Monty Wild
  • 60,180
  • 11
  • 135
  • 304
  • 4
    There's also mobility questions, starting with weight. We already have hollow gaps (sinuses) in our heads. Will you add back all that weight with horns? Too much horn to move freely is also too much. – Jedediah Aug 12 '23 at 01:51
  • 2
    @Jedediah good point. – Monty Wild Aug 12 '23 at 01:54
  • 7
    Yep, these aren't human any more and can't have followed the human evolutionary path - impossible to be an endurance/exhaustion hunter when weighed down with all that extra mass, let alone the reduction in perspiration efficiency from all the plates on the body. There's also all the general points on why spiked armour has limited utility, explained quite humorously in a Lindybeige YouTube video - short version is that a minor advantage for the 0.1% of your time spent in combat is a huge disadvantage for all other aspects of your existence for the other 99.9% of the time. – KerrAvon2055 Aug 12 '23 at 03:23
  • 2
    Horns make your head into a weapon. This is a good solution for quadrupeds, who have not got arms, but probably have teeth and a tough neck. We bipeds use our arms as weapons, or things to hold weapons with a handy rock. Birds are bipeds without arms that can grip, and they never had horns. Ostriches fight by kicking. Raptors used claws. A pachycephalosaurus had a thick head for butting but no horns. It's not proof that people can't have horns, but it is not encouraging. – Richard Kirk Aug 12 '23 at 09:23
  • kissing? no lewd things happen here, not under my watch! –  Aug 12 '23 at 09:46
  • @KerrAvon2055 humnas are the exception, on earth most endurance animals are either big or horned..... or big and horned –  Aug 12 '23 at 09:47
  • 3
    @user104995 Actually, the terrestrial animals with the best endurance after humans are ostriches and other mammals, mostly without horns or with small horns. Wolves, horses, zebras, wildebeest and the like... but fit humans can run them all into the ground, sooner or later. – Monty Wild Aug 12 '23 at 10:41
  • As for lewdness, these horny hominids wouldn't be particularly lewd to us humans. – Monty Wild Aug 12 '23 at 10:42
  • @RichardKirk pachycephalosaurus had horns, quite a lot of them. – John Aug 12 '23 at 14:19
  • @JohnIs this a new find? I thought pachycephalosaurus just had a very thick head, which does suggest some sort of head-butting combat. This was the only example I could think of where something two-legged used its head for butting, but there may be others with horns. – Richard Kirk Aug 13 '23 at 08:32
  • @RichardKirk the adult version has a lot of horns on the sides of the head and a big bony ball on top, also other horns on the snouth, jawline and nose... and some believe yunger individuals of the species had a flat head and covered in more horns than the adults but as far as we know... head bone's don't deform that much in any other animal –  Aug 13 '23 at 20:55
  • I don't think this is a great answer. Most of the time when people ask "I want a reason for this" people say "it's fantasy, just do it if it's cool". Here OP just ask if some end result is practical, the fact that it wouldn't appear in a realistic setting shouldn't really matter. – Jemox Aug 14 '23 at 09:25
13

Anything more than a handful is too much.

Humans have something no horned animal has: prehensile hands. Any horns large enough to be grabbed will be a massive disadvantage in a fight, giving the opponent an easy way to grab and control the head, and thus the whole body.

It's doubtful any horns small enough not to produce this problem would be much use, but they could evolve as sexual markers.

Jack Aidley
  • 7,447
  • 1
  • 18
  • 34
8

The dangers and advantages of exoskeletons

There is something important you've glossed over at the start. You've mentioned that a beard cushions the blow. A horn will be more Newtons cradle. Those balls on wires that show how a force is moved through other balls to the outer ones. It shows why a hard surface in itself is not necessarily a good protection, as any force can as easily be passed through. Check out wounds of people shot while having a bullet proof vest. It's not pretty, despite them being alive. A fist against a horn will definitely dissuade pummelling your opponent, so it will be better in the long run. But a single strike against the neck will be better bearded than horned for the receiver.

That being said, that is only when all else is equal. Evolution will likely step into cushion the blow. It is advantageous to catch a blow with a larger surface area as well as over distance. That means you can have the horn move to force of the blow to skin beneath it, which has evolved a clever layer to cushion blows. A larger surface area thanks to the horn means it can be a thinner layer, giving the explanation why it's better than just having such layer on top. The horn is also better suited against sharp things, which might be more important in a world where sharp horn edges can frequently come close.

Unfortunately horns provide one really bad property. Weight. They can make people top heavy, requiring much more muscles to stay upright. With a thicker neck it can also make it more difficult to turn a head. Having horns is a costly business in not just growing, but even without it growing after maturity it has a large cost on the body and movement as well.

Finally there's the plates on the rest of the body. These have the same problems as the horns with transferring energy and being heavy. Humans only have an 'exoskeleton' around the brain and a layer to cushion blows. This is because at a certain size, an exoskeleton for the rest of the body is simply too heavy. Your proposition of plates is even worse. Not only does it transfer the energy and is heavy, but it's also not used as an exoskeleton. So now you have in essence two skeletons to maintain, of which the outer one would be too heavy even without the inner skeleton.

That being said, I would always choose story over reality. For a good story people will ignore or not think about such trifling things.

Trioxidane
  • 36,395
  • 2
  • 36
  • 128
  • 1
    Horn will still help protect the neck, the problem with striking the neck is not bruising its crushing the soft arteries and windpipe below. dispersing the force over a larger area is exactly what you want. – John Aug 12 '23 at 14:12
  • An upwards horn from the torso or a downwards horn from the chin could shield the neck (or at least deflect a blow). The pain that someone would suffer in their fist when hitting a horn would also instinctively make them hit less hard. If the blow is really too hard, then the horn could break to dissipate some of the energy, just like a biker's helmet breaks on impact. – Stef Aug 12 '23 at 16:19
4

I'd be interested to see the evidence that a beard provides any significant cushioning to being punched in the face. A beard would have to be VERY thick for this to work. I find the theory that a beard helps keep your face warm in cold weather much more plausible. On the other hand I don't notice feeling any colder when I go outside in winter since I shaved off my beard. I always found that the main advantage of a beard was that it helped to hide my face so women didn't notice how unattractive I am. :-)

That said ... As others have noted, a long horn can be a disadvantage in combat: an opponent can grab it and use it to control your head (or whatever part of the body).

If you had a hundred horns all over your body, these would likely get in the way of performing routine tasks. Likewise large horns could be heavy and weigh you down. There's probably a reason why no real animal has a hundred horns.

Yes, a horn could get in the way of some other creature trying to attack you. But a better defense would probably be a thick skull. Which in fact people already have. One could always say it would be better if it was thicker still, but then again you have trade offs. At some point it becomes so heavy that it takes a lot of muscles just to move your head.

It suddenly occurs to me that when people make defensive armor, they do NOT put horns on it. (Viking helmets with horns were a product of fiction, a Wagner opera, and were never used in real life.) If horns were a good defense, surely armor with horns would have proven effective and become popular.

Jay
  • 14,988
  • 2
  • 27
  • 50
  • 1
    Several real animals have hundreds of horns covering the skin(aka scales), armadillo and pangolin, not to mention reptiles in general, ankylosaurid dinosaurs when all in on it. The bread defense idea was proposed in anthropology and appeared to be supported by very badly designed initial testing, but did not stand up to further testing. – John Aug 12 '23 at 21:57
  • 1
    Scales are not the same as horns, they don't create the sort of "get in the way" problem that I was referring to. Anklyosaurus is an interesting counter example. Note their horns are arranged in a sort of circle around the outside, possibly the optimum design for a "polyhorned" creature to avoid this problem. – Jay Aug 13 '23 at 04:44
  • 1
    If you want to see how much difference a beard makes when it's cold, try going skiing. Although I rather suspect that the real reason for beards is simply to make the head look bigger. Such ornamentation occurs in various animals, including various primates. – Jack Aidley Aug 13 '23 at 10:46
  • I was surprised to find out there is actually evidence in support of the defence hypothesis: see https://academic.oup.com/iob/article/2/1/obaa005/5799080 – Jack Aidley Aug 13 '23 at 10:49
  • @JackAidley saw that exact study mentioned in an youtube video a few months ago, that's why it surpised me to see monty wild and others say it's not true because the theory failed testing when they literally tested it :| –  Aug 13 '23 at 11:28
  • 4
    @user104995 Speaking as a biologist - it's not particularly compelling evidence. It's quite a weak result, not directly testing any advantage in actual fighting, and even evidence for a benefit wouldn't prove that it was the evolutionary cause of beards. In contrast, actual people who do fight professionally (i.e. boxers, UFC, etc.) don't seem to be particularly beardy and you'd have expected them to exploit any advantage available. – Jack Aidley Aug 13 '23 at 11:37
  • @JackAidley because as I mentioned in my question, it's about weight classes... if a 60kg vs 60kg punch each other they won't feel much to anything and nothing is gonna break... if a 80kg punches a 60kg... the smaller guy is either gonna die or break his own jaw... if a 60kg punches a 80kg... the smaller guy is probably gonna hurt himself.... and if a 80kg punches an 80kg... then they are big enough to cause head trauma and eventual dementia. Weight classes are as small as 3kg difference simply because people can actually kill other people with 1 single punch, it is more common than expected. –  Aug 13 '23 at 12:19
  • I am not talking about the horns on the head, I am talking about the "hundreds of horns covering the body", that many real animals have. – John Aug 13 '23 at 12:54
  • @john And I'll repeat, scales are not horns, by any stretch of the imagination. Even if they're made out of similar material -- which frankly I don't know -- a shield is not a spear. – Jay Aug 14 '23 at 00:38
  • @Jay Scales and horn are made of the exact same material, the only difference between horn and a scale is location and size, a big thing on the head is a horn a small thing on the body is a scale. hundreds of small horns covering the body ARE scales. – John Aug 14 '23 at 02:36
  • @john But they have a different size and shape. And the issue I brought up had to do with size and shape, and not material. My TV remote is made of plastic and my cell phone is made of plastic. That doesn't mean the two are the same thing or serve the same purpose. Saying that x IS y because the two are made of the same material is simply not true. – Jay Aug 14 '23 at 06:38
  • @jay no they don't, there is a continuous spectrum of size and shape scales/horns, scales and horns are the same material grown in the same way from the same tissue. I'm sorry you are just wrong. Your argument is like saying the forelimbs of a bat and the forelimbs of a turtles are not both forelimbs because they have different sizes and shapes. – John Aug 14 '23 at 13:39