6

In order for different humanoid races (humans, elves, orcs, dwarves..) to evolve, they need to be separated for a long time, in different environments. However, if all races are supposed to be sentient, their common ancestor must have been sentient. If we take this as the point where humans have become behaviorally modern, that common ancestor would develop into a modern society in about 50,000 years. However, that does seem a somewhat short time-scale to allow for different evolutionary paths, considering anatomically modern humans are about 200,000 years old.

Somehow, development of civilization would have to be suspended for about 150,000 years to allow for additional evolution. The most logical target would be agriculture, which arose about 10,000 years ago, which suggests that agriculture takes a while to figure out, but once it's there, civilization will develop quickly.

Although development of agriculture is slow, it's somewhat inevitable, as even in Aboriginal Australia some very early forms where practiced before the Europeans arrived. Locking every race out of suitable areas would seem futile.

A thought I had was to use a volcanic or impact winter, where conditions would simply be too harsh to allow for effective agriculture. But what I could find of their time-scales, they seemed too short.

So how could cognitively modern humanoids be delayed in agriculture, and civilization after that, to give them enough time to evolve into different races?

[edit] I know of the question Multiple humanoid evolution. This question is about timescales, since it generally takes longer for a species to evolve than to develop civilization after attaining behavioral modernity.

Arcturus24
  • 63
  • 4
  • 1
    Related, possible duplicate: How would multi-race.... – Frostfyre Jan 19 '17 at 20:08
  • I've read that one, this question is a bit of an extension about timescales, since developing civilization is faster than evolution. I'll edit my post to make that clear. – Arcturus24 Jan 19 '17 at 20:42
  • I take issue with several assumptions here. 1) If all races are supposed to be sentient, their common ancestor must have been sentient. An incorrect assumption; convergent evolution could also lead to sentience later; it's just less likely. 2) 50,000 years isn't enough for speciation. First of all, speciation is poorly defined, but even so, even in species with long generations, speciation can occur - especially when population bottlenecks come into play. Furthermore, it is possible that some or all of the races were bred by another, older race - domestic speciation can be very fast. – Adam Wykes Jan 20 '17 at 04:59
  • 1
  • The problem was indeed mostly that half a dozen races would be unlikely to develop sentience in such a short span, that when they met again, none would be overly more developed than the other. Neanderthals might have developed sentience on their own, but they were overwhelmed by the slightly more developed Sapiens. 2) That is indeed a good point.
  • – Arcturus24 Jan 20 '17 at 12:54